Home AboutArchivesBest Of Subscribe

While We Have Still Got Some Insanity Left

Meta / TV Comedy

Website stats are funny old things. For a start, it’s become deeply unfashionable to actually care about them. “Write for yourself, not for others”, people cry, myself included. This is, on the face of it, an entirely reasonable attitude… but I have to admit that these days, I really want people to read my stuff. So much of my writing relies on other people helping me with my research, and the more people who read my work, the better and more widespread that research gets.

The other odd thing about stats is that what is an extremely successful article by my standards, is a mere rounding error when it comes to some sites. As detailed in my 15 year retrospective, the most popular article I’ve ever written on Dirty Feed has had about 45k hits over the years. The second most popular article I’ve ever written has had nearly 18k hits. A lot of pieces I’m very proud of have 2-3k hits. This piece on the pilot of Fawlty Towers, featuring material which has never been published before, has had less than 1k hits. I don’t lie awake thinking about it too much, but I know damn well plenty of worse sites than this one get exponentially more views. It can get mildly frustrating.

But perhaps not as frustrating as the following.

Back in 2013, I uploaded the following YouTube video. It’s a clip from It Ain’t Half Hot Mum, “Showing the Flag”, broadcast on the 2nd January 1975. It’s one of my very favourite moments of the series, featuring Don Estelle corpsing spectacularly. It also contains a masterclass from Windsor Davies on how to ride the the laughter from a studio audience.

That video has had over one million views. It is by far he most popular thing I have ever published online. Never mind in-depth articles about flash frames in The Young Ones which are the result of years of research and thought – just rip a random sitcom clip, shove it on YouTube, and watch the views mount up.

Anyway, I am very mature and sensible and have entirely come to peace with all of this and think it is all brilliant.

Fifteen for Fifteen

Meta

5 years10 years • 15 years

Fifteen years of anything is an odd anniversary to celebrate, really. Five years is a reasonable commitment to anything. Ten years is obviously special. Twenty years is miraculous. But fifteen? What does that actually mean?

Still, I wanted to mark fifteen years of writing Dirty Feed somehow. But just doing a list of my favourite pieces again seemed mildly pathetic, especially when I’m definitely going to do one of those for the 20th anyway. So instead, here is a list of the fifteen most popular articles on the site over the past fifteen years, in terms of traffic.

This sometimes matches with my favourite stuff… and sometimes very much doesn’t.

[Read more →]

Read more about...

Dirty Feed: Best of 2024

Meta

201520162017201820192020202120222023 • 2024

Well, another year, another complete failure to get my big Christmas music mix ready for you all. I’ve got various incomplete edits of it stretching back over a decade now. And I was so looking forward to annoying people because it starts with a Chris Moyles clip.

Never mind, let’s take look at what I have managed to get round to doing. Here’s the best of Dirty Feed from the past year. Suitable musical accompaniment is embedded below.

[Read more →]

Read more about...

This Guy Are Sick

Meta

Recently, I was going through some of my old emails from 2009. That’s from before Dirty Feed was even launched. In fact, those of you with very long memories may remember that Dirty Feed didn’t even start out as Dirty Feed; it was originally called “Transistorised” for most of the launch year of 2010, after an old Kenny Everett line about “transistorised people”.

Transistorised doesn’t work at all as a name, but I have to say I rather like one of my other proposed ideas, which I never used: “This Guy Are Sick”, after a notorious piece of Engrish in Final Fantasy VII. I still think that’s pretty good.

Less good, perhaps, was one of my early logo ideas:

This Guy Are Sick logo - all lowercase, letters bunched up together, in black/blue/maroon

Hmmmm. To be fair, I think the above design was mainly because I only had access to Microsoft Word during a boring workday. Although I’m not sure there’s any excuse for that bilious shade of maroon.

The same document also has some of my article ideas for what eventually became Dirty Feed. For instance, here’s the rough, high-level outline for a planned piece on The Fast Show:

You Ain’t Seen These, Right?

  • Introduction, what the show is
  • Radio Times article – what the team say
  • Comparison between Fast Show Night and DVD release versions
  • Conclusion – better than most teams manage in their regular shows, Harry Enfield lost material

And lo and behold, I’ve finally written about You Ain’t Seen These… Right? this month. And exactly as planned, right down to the granularity of comparing the broadcast and DVD versions. I even quote extensively from the Radio Times article, and the conclusion is still about lost Harry Enfield material!

I was originally going to write all that 15 years ago. So if you ever wondered how long it takes me to get round to doing things… now you know.

An Extremely Important Point About The Fast Show

Meta / TV Comedy

I am currently in the middle of writing about the previously unseen sketches from The Fast Show which featured on Fast Show Night. The only surprising thing about the above sentence is that I haven’t got round to it before now. You can plug all my obsessions into a spreadsheet, and the above article pops out like magic.

But before it’s published, I have to make a decision. What do I call the programme?

The Radio Times capsule from the 11th September 1999 gives the following title:

Radio Times capsule for the show, featuring: You Ain't Seen These, Right?

You Ain’t Seen These, Right? Brilliant, I’ll go with that. Still, I’d best just check that article they point to on Page 7…

Radio Times article, featuring: You Ain't Seen These Right!

You Ain’t Seen These Right! Hmmm, OK. Best check what the actual programme has:

Grab from the programme title card, featuring: You Ain't Seen These... Right?

The line under the programme name is mildly irritating, but the above is clearly meant to be You Ain’t Seen These… Right? Three different ways of punctuating the show. What to do?

Maybe the production paperwork for the programme confirms which of the three it should be:

The production paperwork, featuring: You Ain't Seen These. Right?

Yes, that is a full-stop. You Ain’t Seen These. Right? Sigh. Make that four.

In the end, I’ve decided to go for You Ain’t Seen These… Right? When I worked in BBC pres, in cases like these when there was inconsistency, we’d often plump for what was actually on the programme’s title card. Moreover, the extended commercial video edit of the programme, called You Ain’t Seen All of These… Right?, is not only punctuated like that on the title card:

Grab from the programme title card, featuring: You Ain't Seen All of These... Right?

But also has that name on the box:

Photo of the VHS case, featuring: You Ain't Seen All Of These... Right?

Look, if nobody in 1999 was going to be consistent, THEN FINE, I’LL DO THE DONKEYWORK.

Just nobody mention that the ellipsis has four dots on the videocassette itself. I have a headache.

Read more about...

Abandoned.

Life / Meta

I started writing an article last week. It was going to be a good one. Somebody was going to get a thoroughly deserved slagging off. I don’t write many of those kind of pieces these days, so it was high time I really put somebody in their place.

Just to be sure, I did a little research first, in order to check I wasn’t being an idiot. And it fairly quickly became clear that while I did have some semblance of a point… so did they. The issue was rather more complex than it first appeared. In the end, I abandoned the piece entirely; the research needed to make it worth publishing was best spent on other things, although I might return to the topic at some point.

Which is fine. I’m not expecting any medals for a basic level of truthfulness and competence. Still, it seems a lesson worth noting publicly. If you never find yourself abandoning a position because it was fundamentally misguided, then you’re probably doing something wrong.

If you’re confident that your gut instinct and personal ideologies are always correct… they probably aren’t, you know.

*   *   *

One of the other blogs I follow has just posted something titled “Believing in Yourself”.

I never was very good at inspirational writing.

Summer Hiatus

Meta

Yeah, yeah, I know. I don’t have a good record with this kind of thing. There is a very real possibility I’ll pick up writing this site again after a couple of weeks. But for various reasons, I think I should at least try to have a break from publishing Dirty Feed for the summer.

I won’t bore you with paragraphs of self-important crap. Short version: I have a new job which is taking up a lot of my mental energy, and I need to start relaxing a bit more on my days off. Or going on some long walks. Anything, really, than cracking my knuckles and sitting down to write about The Young Ones again.

Truth be told, I’m experiencing a certain ennui regarding the site, which is very rare for me. Time to take a break rather than ruin things for good. When I return, I’ll be doing some different kinds of posts along with my usual nonsense to keep things interesting. I have a few ideas about that, which I might work on a little during my time off.

My current thinking is that I’ll be back properly in October, give or take the odd stray update here and there if I can’t resist it. The newsletter is also on hiatus as well. And I probably won’t be around on social media much. (That last bit is a lot easier than it used to be, at least.)

Well, goodnight. And remember: don’t get murdered.

The Ballad of SKP003375

Meta / TV Comedy

Warning: the following is for hardcore TV research nerds only.

The most complicated series of articles I’ve ever written here on Dirty Feed is probably last year’s five-part epic on The Young Ones and flash frames. It’s the kind of project which has you waking up in a cold sweat at night, screaming about /72 edits.

It’s also a project which I think turned out OK. Sure, I may not have got to the root of every single question to do with those damn flash frames, but I got closer than anybody has before, and that’s surely worth something. It certainly manages to be more accurate than most newspaper reports from the time.

Of those remaining questions, though, one of them really bugs me. It’s regarding these two flash frames from “Nasty”, first transmitted on the 29th May 1984:

Pottery wheel
Dripping tap


Despite how much I poked at them, and how much other people poked at them for me, I never managed to figure out the original source for these frames. I mean, I tried. I really, really tried. I even ended up looking through programmes about sodding pottery that the BBC broadcast in the early 80s. No luck. What programme did those two shots originate from?

The only clue we have is the following sentence in the paperwork for “Nasty”:

Flash frame of tap dripping from K065402 transferred to H25992, and Potter’s Wheel from SKP003375 transferred to H25992.

There are three spools, aka tapes, mentioned in that sentence. H25992 is the spool which all the flash frames in the series was compiled onto, before they were scattered across the various episodes. But K065402 and SKP003375, the original source of the frames, seemed impossible to track down. No current BBC database – at least any that I know if – seems to recognise those tape numbers. Which is a bizarre state of affairs in itself. Nor did anybody seem to know what those spool prefixes actually meant.

I came up with all kinds of theories, mind. Did “K” stand for TK, or Telecine? Is SKP “Scotland Telecine”? Was I, in fact, going completely mad?

Such thoughts eventually faded. I finally finished the series of articles, made a half-hearted promise that I’d investigate more next year, and that was that. Meanwhile, this year’s long project is an investigation into all the stock footage used in Smashie and Nicey: the End of an Era. And my latest post is on material of lovely young ladies walking down the street, used as part of the sequence on Radio Fab’s DJ handover.

And one of the sources of those lovely young ladies is listed as the following in the paperwork:

Kings Road Stock.
7 secs
SKP2304
BBC

And suddenly, something clicked into place. This was footage taken from an actual stock library, rather than a finished programme. And it had the number SKP2304. The potter’s wheel footage from “Nasty” had the number SKP003375. The “SK” in “SKP” surely stands for “Stock”, and that potter’s wheel footage surely came from a stock library too. It’s quite possible it had never been broadcast before The Young Ones used it.

Of course, questions remain. I say it’s possible it had “never have been broadcast before”, but the emphasis is on “possible”; just because The Young Ones took it from a stock library, its ultimate origin may still have been from a broadcast programme. My only point is that it’s not guaranteed to have done so. And the “K” prefix for the dripping tap material is still up for debate.

I might figure this out in 30 years, you know.

Read more about...

,

A Tedious Update on Dirty Feed’s Social Media Presence Which You Can Safely Ignore

Meta

a) Last year, I was trying to keep four separate social media accounts active: Twitter/X, Mastodon, Threads, and Bluesky. I can’t be bothered with any of that, so I’ve binned off the first three.

b) Just follow me on Bluesky @dirtyfeed.org. I’m not completely in love with Bluesky, but I like it more than anything else right now.

c) If you’re not on Bluesky, you can subscribe to Dirty Feed’s RSS feed here, or subscribe to my newsletter here, which will get you all the good stuff.

d) My Twitter/X account @mumoss is technically still active, but I don’t post on it publicly any more, and only use it for DMs. Consider @dirtyfeed to no longer be in use for anything. When Bluesky gets DMs, I imagine I’ll get rid of Twitter/X for good.

e) Oh, you want something actually interesting? Like, I don’t know, something fun about Smashie And Nicey: The End Of An Era?

This Sunday.

“A Course of Leeches…”

Life / Meta

Paul Hayes, “Mopping Up… Or Moping Up…?”:

“Am I just a worthless parasite, leeching off other people’s creativity?

It’s a paranoia which does seize me, sometimes. Not often; not all the time. But last night, watching last night’s very enjoyable return of Doctor Who, I was at one point towards the end overcome with that melancholy feeling of knowing I could never, ever do this. I could never do what Russell T Davies does. […]

But that worry does take hold of me, every now and then. I’m so proud of writing books and articles about this show, making radio pieces about it. Proud that I can be a tiny little part of it in my professional life, be engaged with it and share that engagement. But is it all just worthless? Would I not be better off trying to create and do something of my own? Am I just a laughable figure, building so much of my life around something to which I have made absolutely no contribution whatsoever, and have never had anything to do with?”

The answer, of course, is that Paul Hayes is the very opposite of either a worthless parasite or a laughable figure, having done incredible work when it comes to documenting Doctor Who. But this is obvious, and Paul knows it. The rest of his blog post is a brilliant analysis of exactly why researching and documenting a show is a worthwhile thing to do, and I highly recommend you read it.

And yet… I know exactly what he means. And I think most people who make things about other people’s work feel like this at times. You can logically know that what you do is worthwhile, can fully defend someone else from worries like these… and yet still feel that troublesome pang when it comes to yourself. Not all the the time. Just occasionally.

If I’m brutally honest, I sometimes have slightly darker worries about myself: that my writing is about trying to have control over the shows I loved as a kid. I’m very proud of this piece on Knightmare; it was everything I had floating around in my head for years, and managed to write about at a level which I don’t always manage. It’s one of the very best things I’ve ever done. But there is definitely a certain amount of trying to control and compartmentalise my feelings about the show. And perhaps, a little of trying to own a part of it.

Even as I write that latter remark, it seems a foolish thing to accuse myself of. Why can’t writing things like that simply be a positive thing? Why does my brain attempt to turn it into something unpleasant? But these are the cynical things you worry about, when you spend a long time writing about other people’s work, and not making anything which stands on its own.

Because sometimes, I wonder what might have happened. If I hadn’t had the confidence kicked out of me at secondary school. A time when I showed vague hints of promise in drama class… only to be stamped down on. If only I could have been one of those people who managed to stop bullies by “making them laugh”. The kind of thing you read about in interviews with very, very funny people. The Platonic Ideal of how to deal with that kind of nonsense.

I couldn’t do it. I reacted by shrinking in on myself instead.

None of which, in 2024, is especially useful. But it’s something I’m pondering at the back of my head. For many reasons, I haven’t had the best start to the year. I think I may need some kind of outlet for creativity which isn’t just writing about other people’s creativity. Exactly what, I don’t know, beyond a few stray thoughts. And if those stray thoughts cohere into something bigger, it won’t be anything I’d put in public for a very long time, if ever.

But I think I might need something.