Noise to Signal

Login disabled.

Lab Rats: A Bee

Oh, I really am growing to love that theme tune.

The rest? I'm finding it immensely likable. A ghastly, non-committal description that somehow avoids discussing the show's true merits. But, well, liking Lab Rats is a start. It makes you hope that finding it 'hysterical', rather than 'amusing', will follow.

So, let's get the usual complaints out of the way.

One - the editing was as ugh as ever, with clunky cuts, messy close-ups, mid-shot reframings and the expected mess with the laugh track as the sound lurches to cover a change of take. Is this the least technically proficient show on TV right now?

Two - once again ill-judged performances suck the life from otherwise-decent gags. Brian spinning the disorientated Mycroft around to make him think he'd just travelled to work? Spot-on. But McGivern's heavy-handed "Ah, it's a shorter journey than you think" badly needed underplaying... and wasn't.

Dr. Vaabit, there.

Three - Mike McShane. God, I cheered when he arrived, glad to have yet another guest star who would find the tone and...oh, what's this? Hmm, just seems to be settling for 'loud and American'. Compared to Dr Kyrtistyges and Inspector Goodman, this is one-note stuff. Though the lines suggest it was also a nothing part on the page. Shame.

Four - the rivalry of two scientists. This should have been the perfect idea for the show. Over-zealous competitive rivalry is a sitcom staple - Cheers got acres of mileage from their Bar Wars episodes, and a show like this is ideal for visualising all kinds of insanely-escalating nonsense. So... how come it all feels a bit 'meh'? (Well, mostly it's because more time is spent discussing, and complaining about, the rivalry than is spent coming up with any clever back-and-forth.)

Five - the execution still falls down on the basics. Cara's panic inside the bee costume is never explained, yet it's meant to fuel the last few minutes of the show. It seems to be an issue of discomfort, maybe claustrophobia, but vagueness does not help you bring your laughs to a peak. 'Did I miss something?' is not a good thing for an audience to be asking. It inhibits the reaction.

Brian and Professor MyCroft come up with the obvious idea.

Yet it's odd to say that, by a narrow margin, this is probably the most consistent episode of the series so far. Footing is being found.

For a start - yes! - Alex and Cara spend a large part of the episode together , on their own, being funny. Jo Enright continues with her spot-on delivery, and Addison is improving. As with A Donor he's at his best one-on-one, with someone who's got the tone nailed. That he spends the bulk of his screen time riffing in a room with Enright guarantees some proper, consistent giggles.

Secondly, the flow of scenes, and the whole story, is a little smoother. Fewer gags are just dropped in any-old-where, which one assumes comes from the writers gaining confidence in writing 'scenes' rather than 'gags'. Best of all, with a flow like that you can then justifiably pull off neat, unexpected cackles - a brilliant cut to two men and their giant magnet and Cara's 'urinals' walk-by. The surprises work because you're into the rhythm, like a song briefly jumping time signature, whereas before all we could expect was inconsistency.

Dr. Vaabit at Tony Hart's sex party.

There also seems to be a better through-line, of remembering what's where and available to use. McShane's glitter camouflage is the last of a three-part visual 'bit' that acquits itself splendidly - from silhouette of the impact, through reveal of the "Tony Hart sex party" outline, to the glittery victim re-inserting himself as a disguise. Splendid. The "There's been a murder" translation runner does the job, too. (Though it fails to justify the final "Oh F -" once again.)

Things still show their workings a little too clearly here and there - an intercom buzzer sequence would have been twice as funny if the device had been established in advance of the scene were it was mis-used - but for the most part set-up and pay-off are kept suitably separate. (And the buzzer sequence did lead to a Top Cat reference that made me clap like an infant.)

I'm also putting in a big 'huzzah' for the loss of the animated scene-to-scene bumpers. They didn't work - were too infrequent to be anything other than unusual - and their loss no doubt contributed to the overall sense that everything did join together.

Overall, then, a slight step forward. And extra points for Mycroft's "That rascally Vaabit" line.

3 Stars

About this entry


Comments

So what did you think of the Looney Tunes theme running throughout?

By Ridley
August 04, 2008 @ 12:36 am

reply / #


Can’t speak for Andrew - although I’m presuming from the final line of the review that he liked it! - but I thought it was superb. Really bloody good - possibly my favourite storyline thread so far in the show.

Somebody on another forum likened it to something from The Goodies, and I think that’s spot-on.

John Hoare's picture

By John Hoare
August 04, 2008 @ 12:41 am

reply / #


> Things still show their workings a little too clearly here and there - an intercom buzzer sequence would have bee twice as funny

Ha!

Tanya Jones's picture

By Tanya Jones
August 04, 2008 @ 8:51 am

reply / #


>Five - the execution still falls down on the basics. Cara’s panic inside in the bee costume is never explained, yet it’s meant to fuel the last few minutes of the show. It seems to be an issue of discomfort, maybe claustrophobia, but vagueness does not help you bring your laughs to a peak. ‘Did I miss something?’ is not a good thing for an audience to be asking. It inhibits the reaction.

Oh, and this is correct. Jo Enright is very funny here, but it needed more ‘ooh, I’m dead claustrophobic, me’ type of dialogue to set it up.

Tanya Jones's picture

By Tanya Jones
August 04, 2008 @ 8:52 am

reply / #


> So what did you think of the Looney Tunes theme running throughout?

Imperfect, sometimes clunky, but likable. Much like the show, really.

Andrew's picture

By Andrew
August 04, 2008 @ 1:03 pm

reply / #


It’s amazing how much comedy Jo Enright wrung out of stumbling around the set in a bee costume.

As ever, I really liked the episode - but the ending was very sudden. It felt like it ended five minutes before it was supposed to. Yet more pacing problems, along with the fact that yes, the bee costume wasn’t set up properly.

I keep being reminded of the idea Linehan has about the first series of .The IT Crowd - that the first series was The IT Crowd version 1.0. I totally disagree with him - but I think the idea does apply to Lab Rats. The show feels like the first version of something that just needs a bit more refinement. I really hope it gets the chance, as it’s making me laugh more than enough to deserve it - and the potential is definitely there.

John Hoare's picture

By John Hoare
August 05, 2008 @ 12:05 am

reply / #


Gonna check this out on iplayer. At least it’s an actual sitcom. that’s a start, but I haven’t gelled with it yet (watching more than the first episode might have helped…) Atm I’m watching Summer Heights High like crazy - I still can’t get over how good it is.

By performingmonkey
August 05, 2008 @ 9:10 pm

reply / #


It’s well worth a second watch. It’s certainly not perfect, but there’s a hell of a lot of good things about it.

John Hoare's picture

By John Hoare
August 05, 2008 @ 9:43 pm

reply / #


Set tour!

“Interesting” things to note, then:

a) This was clearly shot during the first episode broadcast (the state of the sets, the snail, and so on). And yet they mention that in a *previously*-shot episode, one part of the studio was used for the tent set - which is Episode 2 in broadcast order.

And yet here’s the thing - someone on another forum I go on said that Ep 1 was pretty much the same as the pilot they saw recorded two years ago (but without the character of Brian, interestingly - let’s hope it shows up on the inevitable DVD!) Odd that it wasn’t first in production order this time round, although I suppose there could be any number of reasons why it wasn’t.

b) The snail was a MODEL!

c) They quite clearly show the audience to prove the show has one. The fact that people have accused the show of having canned laughter - in 2008, where audiences are supposed to be savvy about television - absolutely beggars belief.

d) I love the sets. They’re great.

e) That picture of the Dean with Ainsley Harriott is fucking hilarious.

f) Simon Nicholls has clearly been hanging around Armando Iannucci too long.

There’s some interesting interviews and other stuff on the Lab Rats site, actually - well worth having a look at.

John Hoare's picture

By John Hoare
August 07, 2008 @ 12:55 am

reply / #


> There’s some interesting interviews and other stuff on the Lab Rats site, actually

If the whole show was as consistently funny as the ‘Brief History’ PDF, they’d be onto a winner!

Andrew's picture

By Andrew
August 07, 2008 @ 1:34 am

reply / #