Noise to Signal

Login disabled.

Doctor Who - Rise of the Cybermen

I'm really gutted I'm not giving this episode five stars. We at Noise To Signal haven't given an episode of series two five stars yet, which to me is a massive oversight simply because last week's The Girl In The Fireplace was one of the most wonderful pieces of television I've seen in a very long time.

The Doctor, running away from some blokes in metal suits Still, though, I can't give this five stars, because it wasn't quite perfect, even despite the completely spot-on title (surely the best episode title of the RTD era, full-stop). Maybe it's because I was looking forward to it so bloody much - I've even been listening to the brilliant Big Finish audio play Spare Parts, whose writer Marc Platt got a "Thanks" credit on Rise, in anticipation - but in a number of ways it didn't quite deliver the thrills I was expecting.

From the first time it was mentioned, I was intrigued by the idea of a "parallel universe" idea showing up in New Who, as it's just not something I associate with the series. In Red Dwarf? Sure. But when you've got a series that's so inherently structured around time travel, it seems quite out of place to start hopping dimensions as well. Still, it was nicely set up - with an at least vaguely convincing in-show-logic reason for it happening - and the opening scenes on the "other" Earth played out well. I don't really think, though, that it's been followed through particularly strongly so far - perhaps because the story of Rose and Mickey exploring a different Earth is, of course, jostling for space with the story of the genesis (let's call a spade a spade, here!) of the Cybermen. As such, there's no real room for explanation of the various divergences, such as why Pete Tyler is such a success on this Earth selling what is, essentially, Crap Pop.

Second Opinion

This is the episode of series 2 that I've most looked forward to. As with any icon of the Doctor Who canon, it was crucial that the Cybermen came back looking, acting and sounding more impressive than any of their previous incarnations. Now the BBC are actually bothering to spend some money on the series, the Doctor's old enemies are being given the treatment they deserve. Boy, have they spent some money. The Cybermen look beautiful, tough, and really rather scary. No wonder Russell T Davies was gibbering with excitement over them in Doctor Who Confidential, because they ooze eerieness and danger. At last I got the true meaning of the Cybermen: they are us, but in a terrifying form. I'm happy to hold off buying my very own Doctor doll, but I'll be first in the shop door when the Cybermen dolls are released.

The story anchors itself firmly in the present day by using Cybus Industries' earpieces as a metaphor for our increasingly technology-obsessed and media-dominated society. It's not a new issue, but it's fair to question the potential for control that arises when we let governments and large organisations dominate our world view. The current controversy over ID cards is commented on through those who either refuse or are unable to wear Cybus's earpieces: they are outsiders, unable to participate in their society. The earpieces give permission to take part in mainstream society; in other words, permission to exist.

The Doctor realises yet again how difficult working with human beings is, as Rose wants to discover what she never had, despite the Doctor's warnings that they aren't her parents, and this isn't her world. Mickey, after proving to the Doctor that Rose is more important than him, then tries to find a role for himself in this alternate universe, but finds that his search to prove that he can be useful leads him into a situation he could never have predicted. It is gratifying to see Mickey come into his own at last. There's some fantastic performances in this episode, with Don Warrington giving a dignified performance as the President of Great Britain, Roger Lloyd-Pack hamming it up as John Lumic, and Mona Hammond giving Noel Clarke something to work with as Ricky's grandmother.

Graeme Harper does a fantastic job of directing, managing to convey the full horror of the Cybermen and the apparent helplessness of even the Doctor against them. The Cyberman kicking though the Tyler's window is the most intimidating and beautiful shot so far of the second series, IMO. The brutality of John Lumic is realised in perhaps the most uncomfortable scene we've seen so far in the new episodes, although, with all good drama, it's what we don't see that made me squirm and squeal on the sofa.

In summary, this was the best episode of series 2 so far for me, as it achieved the remarkable feat of making 45 minutes seem like 10. I really can't wait to see how the Doctor gets out of this one...

Mickey continues to improve, which is of course a sure-fire sign that he won't be around much longer (well, that and the fact that we know that only the Doctor and Rose are travelling in the TARDIS when The Idiot's Lantern comes around). Opinions differ as to how he'll depart, but there seems to be a definite sense of rounding out his character to the extent that his staying in the alternate universe will feel like a genuine and natural progression. I like the idea of taking time out to establish things that we - like the Doctor - had never even thought to ask about him, and I also felt that in the early scenes he made for just as good a companion as Rose, with the way in which he understood the alternate-Earth concept and applied "our" sort of approach to it. Noel Clarke's performances this series have been a world away from series one, and this was still the case here - but he convinced rather less as the tough "Ricky".

Indeed, acting was a bit of a mixed bag this time out. Byker Grove Bloke (as he will forever be known) was a bit flat, while I was extremely disappointed to have been so unimpressed with Roger Lloyd Pack - but I really didn't think he nailed a suitable sense of menace, nor was there anything particularly compelling about Lumic as portrayed. Better, of course, was the ever-reliable Don Warrington, and I was also impressed by Colin Spaull, whose Mr Crane surely owed a debt to Spare Parts' Thomas Dodd.

Despite some assured direction from Graeme Harper, I really didn't think the pacing of the episode was up to much. Of course, it's best to judge the story as a whole when we've seen two parts - but therein lies the problem, really. Unlike Moffat's expertly-woven Empty Child, this didn't feel like part of a well-structured two-parter - it felt like a lopped-off half of one ninety-minute-long story. As such, rather than having a cohesive beginning, middle and end, the episode instead felt like a lengthy beginning and the warmup of the middle. I should expect, again, that this problem will matter less come The Age of Steel next week, but I'm not wholly keen on the apparent lack of consideration being given towards making the first part a well-constructed episode in its own right.

It almost goes without saying, though, that the episode improved immeasurably once the Cybermen got some proper screentime. You just know that part two is going to be much, much better simply for their extended presence - they were absolutely brilliant. The voices, though disappointingly not as good as Nick Briggs' earlier interpretation in Spare Parts, were chilling, and they really were as relentlessly cold and terrifying as all good Cybermen should be. I liked the bits of detail we got about the horrifying nature of the Cyberising process - particularly the excellently written and delivered line "Because it hurts" - but I'm a little less keen on how polished and robotic they are. They look wonderful, and you can imagine them as a later evolution of the species - but if what we're seeing is the early days of their existence, then I'd have preferred to have seen a much eerier, hodgepodge of bits and pieces, with more evidence of the original human inside. Indeed, while some I've spoken to have interpreted it slightly differently, I got the impression from the episode that what was happening was that the brains were simply being implanted into robotic bodies - and if that is the case, I'm not happy, because that's really not what the Cybermen should be. And I know I'm being quite influenced by Spare Parts here, but I really do think the lack of exploration of the idea of people "upgrading" - sometimes even willingly - to eventually become the Cybermen was something of a missed opportunity.

It's not as if there wasn't plenty to enjoy in the episode - there was, but the majority of it came as a result of the production and direction, rather than the script. It's a little disappointing, after all, that an episode entitled Rise of the Cybermen ended up treating its eponymous scenario almost as the "B-plot", with the bulk of the episode being an exploration of Rose and Mickey's possible alternate timelines; with many of the ideas - and indeed some of the dialogue - being cribbed straight from Paul Cornell's Father's Day. This should have been something truly brilliant - if not a startlingly good piece of television in every respect like the Moffat episodes, then certainly at least something epic and thrilling to rank alongside last year's Dalek appearances. Instead, the moments of genius were just that - moments, instead of something that infused the whole.

But let's at least give it until next week, and judge the story as a whole once we've had some proper action from the old boys themselves. Because on the evidence of the last five minutes of Rise, they're back in style, and we should be in for a cracker.

4 Stars

About this entry


Comments

I would have given this 5 stars, simply for the fact that they combined wonderful Cyberman stuff with something I usually hate (Rose's family) and did it really, really well! This is the first episode this series where I didn't wince at any point. Since Jackie and Mickey featured heavilly, this is a miracle. I'm pleased how Tom MacRae is turning out, actually, as I worried about his ability to write decent Who.

And give me a hammed up villain anyday. I thought Lumic was brilliantly played.

"I guess some comment about crashing the party is in order, HAH HAH"

By Cappsy
May 15, 2006 @ 11:15 pm

reply / #


> but I really do think the lack of exploration of the idea of people "upgrading" - sometimes even willingly - to eventually become the Cybermen was something of a missed opportunity.

I don't think people would be willing to become Cybermen if they heard the screams of the people being 'upgraded'! I know what you mean though. It'd be more chilling and relevant if the technology obsessed public saw Cybernisation as the next cool thing to have done. Although I don't think they'd be able to get away with that at 7pm, it's more extreme than the process itself.

The episode itself didn't do much for me apart from a few select scenes. Lumic was badly 'growly voice' acted by Roger Lloyd-Pack, taking away all the menace the character should have had. The sub-plot of the alternative Tylers seemed forced and extraneous. I KNEW it was bad idea bringing Pete Tyler back as it just screws the effect of Father's Day. And having them rich and successful is just pointless. It would have been way more effective if the only difference in the parallel world was that Pete Tyler didn't get run over. I liked the extra stuff on Mickey though.

By performingmonkey
May 16, 2006 @ 2:50 am

reply / #


I don't think people would be willing to become Cybermen if they heard the screams of the people being 'upgraded'!

Well, again, this is something that comes from Spare Parts - in that, people already have some mechanical parts, such as one character has a replacement chest unit, that sort of thing. It's portrayed as a way of replacing and/or upgrading bits of you that have stopped working. Which is kind of how the Cybermen were meant to have started. The actual full-on Cyberising is then portrayed to people as being the ultimate "augmentation", the idea being that you get "called up" to be a worker/explorer on the surface of Mondas and that you're a hero if you do. So that's why some people actually want to have it done, because they don't fully realise what it entails.

By Seb Patrick
May 16, 2006 @ 7:44 am

reply / #


I'm not exactly a fan of the show (and have never seen a Cyberman episode) but I was rather looking forward to this. I found it all very underwheming. All build-up, no pay-off. I agree that Mickey is finally working and it's a little sad to see him go. If they could also lose the actress who plays Jackie, that would be peachy.

I'd strongly disagree that this is, so far, the best in the series. The Girl in the Fireplace was brilliant and School Reunion was infantile but certainly more fun.

Oh, and David Tennant is FAR better than Christopher Eccleston.

By Pete Martin
May 16, 2006 @ 9:41 am

reply / #


> Oh, and David Tennant is FAR better than Christopher Eccleston.

I'm sorry, but so far I don't agree. He might get better, but at the moment he's trying too hard and coming across a little forced. This is only in certain moments though, he's good most of the time. I actually think he's better in scenes without Rose. He and Billie don't work as well together IMO. I don't know what it is, but it feels to me that neither of them are bringing their a-game to proceedings whereas when it was Chris and Billie it felt like they did ALL the time. I should stop complaining.

By performingmonkey
May 16, 2006 @ 4:17 pm

reply / #


I agree with you - badly acted, woefully paced, poorly scripted - so why the 4 stars young Seb?!? If it wasn't for the risible 'New Earth', this would have been the worst so far for me. The decision to plonk this in a parallel universe and copy bits of 'Father's Day' is just baffling. OK, the last 3-4 minutes were good, but this was 45 minutes of television.

By Andy M
May 16, 2006 @ 5:13 pm

reply / #


"The decision to plonk this in a parallel universe and copy bits of 'Father's Day' is just baffling."

Setting it in a parallel universe makes perfect sense to me. It just seems that RTD and co. are showing respect for the existing continuity, so thought the best course of action was to venture into a territory that will alow them to bring their own genesis story to the fore. It's a brilliant idea, and also beings loads of opportunities to create an unnerving place that just doesn't feel right, adding to the mystery and suspense of the episode.

And, if you think about it, it's not "copying" Father's Day, at all. It's a whole new Pete, a whole new Jackie and Rose's reaction are completely different to Father Day's because the situation is completely different.

By Cappsy
May 16, 2006 @ 7:03 pm

reply / #


Yeah, disappointed with this episode. It just failed on a lot of levels.

Roger Lloyd Pack was pretty ridiculous and only worked when he appeared on the screen like some eccentric Uri Geller figure the media would be interested in.

And I was quite disappointed by the Cybermen, I've got to admit. The first problem is since they've been away the Borg appeared to have thrashed them at their own game. The clearly visible humanity on the Borg was incredibly effective and the assimilation, bringing-us-one-step-closer-to-perfection idea is basically the same. This won't matter for kids though.

The upgrading was a total failure. It just completely fell flat that sequence. People screaming, we're going to put a song over that. Fine. But then we hear the words 'In the jungle, the might jungle'... I tried to find a reason for this. I said to myself, oh, it's a metallic jungle, oh those screams are like animals screaming in the jungle. But that never worked. It was the chance for wit, some black humour, some anything to be honest. But that song... was nothing. It didn't acheive anything.

And even this isn't a copy of Father's Day strictly speaking, it did feel like a rehash of it and I didn't see anything new in it.

Also, wasn't that whole 'download-into-your-head' thing the main idea of The Long Game?

By Rad
May 17, 2006 @ 12:17 pm

reply / #


You have a point about The Long Game. It also had the more chilling "voluntary upgrade" aspect that Seb points out was missing from ROTC.

By James
May 17, 2006 @ 12:29 pm

reply / #


"It just seems that RTD and co. are showing respect for the existing continuity"

I'd agree with you, if it wasn't for the fact that the actual origins of the Cybermen story hinted at in The Tenth Planet and Spare Parts is just much better than the watered-down version we got.

By Andy M
May 17, 2006 @ 12:35 pm

reply / #


"It just seems that RTD and co. are showing respect for the existing continuity".

It raises a lot more problems though, and they'll have to address them. They'll now have to show why it's any big deal that the Doctor is the last of the time lords, so we know that he won't just jump into a dimension where he didn't make the same regrettable decisions. Also I have a real issue with them suggesting that this genesis story is one of a potential infinity of them. If they wanted to reinvent the birth of the Cybermen why not let it be a second generation scenario? Or find a new villain? Because suddenly now we realise there's a version of Genesis of the Daleks where Tom Baker did press those wires together and wipe out the daleks forever, and so on. Some limitations now need to be set on this suddenly infinite universe, before we start wondering why the Doctor and Rose even need to make any kind of tough decisions.

By James
May 17, 2006 @ 1:35 pm

reply / #


I can't be the only one baffled by the whole 'last of the Time Lords' thing. How can someone be the last member of a species that *is* constantly traveling from time period to time period?

This Time War gubbins; how come none of them saw that coming?

By Pete Martin
May 17, 2006 @ 7:15 pm

reply / #


I have to say, I loved it - and I don't speak as a blinkered Who fan who loves every show, as I was disappointed by the first two episodes of this series. But like Cappsy, I like hammy villians...

By John Hoare
May 17, 2006 @ 7:53 pm

reply / #


"I can't be the only one baffled by the whole 'last of the Time Lords' thing. How can someone be the last member of a species that *is* constantly traveling from time period to time period?"

I agree Pete, and it's the same logic that makes the daleks never an extinct foe, since the Doctor can encounter them at any time along their history, and outside it because for a few episodes they were capable of time travel.

I think I can allow the "last of the Time Lords" thing as long as I accept the perspective suddenly advanced in Father's Day, namely that certain fiddling results in meanies emerging that won't let you escape until you've repaired the damage you've done to time. It's not something I understand and I think it's bizarre considering what they've been able to do since Who started, but I'll accept that a certain fear prevents the Doctor returning to Gallifrey any time before the so-called War. Also he generally stayed clear of the other Time Lords because they were obsessed with stopping him doing what he enjoyed, namely being free and exploring/helping other cultures and worlds. I'm sure they made him feel anxious and sick much in the way parents would if they were always angry and wanting to ground you every time you tried to phone home years later.

Even accepting this, I think the realm of parallel universes messes this up. There now has to be something equivalent to that Father's Day scenario to show why leaping between alternative dimensions doesn't afford the freedom it suggests. After all, if they manage to save a bunch of people from a villain there are billions of dimensions where the villain has won - so where's the urgency? And if they fail they can say "well never mind, we're just being part of this infinity of every possible event, let's skip to another dimension to see what *would* have happened". I know they've never had that much control over the tardis but it does raise some problems, I think.

It reminds me of the time in Quantum Leap when the people in the future managed to leap Lee Harvey Oswald back into himself, forcing Sam out - it was never explained why they didn't try the same technique to get Sam finally home. It was just ignored, nobody talked about it ever again but in the audience mind it remained an option and weakened all the later sadness that Sam felt trapped. And one of the complaints levelled at the Matrix sequels was that Neo could fly but he still insisted on hanging around to fight. When you give characters infinity, it's frustrating when it's not clear why they won't use it, and it also removes a certain feeling of menace on an emotional level. Performingmonkey suggests above that with Chris and Billie you always got the impression they were doing their best whatever the situation, whereas with David they've become more flippant about everything. I agree - and I feel it's now harder to engage with the threats of an episode, especially considering the ease with which everything is so often solved within the last five minutes of a story. I'm concerned that the opening out of Who into parallel universe territory lowers the necessary urgency of the series further.

By James
May 17, 2006 @ 9:03 pm

reply / #


I think the story was that Gallifrey and the Daleks were erased from time itself, with nothing left to go to at any point in history.

Besides that, I really don't think it matters. Having The Doctor thinking he's the last of the Timelords is interesting and should lead to an interesting story sometime in the future when he finds he's not really the last...

By Cappsy
May 17, 2006 @ 9:54 pm

reply / #


I agree with Cappsy, the idea that they have been 'erased from time itself' is clearly the idea. Also, that it gave Ecclestone a great dark side that really worked well.

They could always do another Doctors episode, where previous incarnations of the Doctor meet up with the present one. If they ever did the Time War, we could finally get to see the regeneration from McGann to Ecclestone.

By Rad
May 18, 2006 @ 11:59 am

reply / #


> They could always do another Doctors episode, where previous incarnations of the Doctor meet up with the present one. If they ever did the Time War, we could finally get to see the regeneration from McGann to Ecclestone.

This indeed would be awesome. The Three Doctors Mk II, with Eight, Nine and Ten. I reckon they should wait a few years, though. It would make an awesome Christmas special - they could have Tennant going back to the Time War, meeting up with McGann fighting in it, then McGann dies and regenerates into Ecclestone.

Colin Baker could play Gallifrey.

By Ian Symes
May 18, 2006 @ 12:08 pm

reply / #


Nice idea, but of course it'll never happen; certainly not on RTD's watch, as he's said he intends to never bring old Doctors into it. I think he'll probably let the novel writers do a series of books telling the story at some point.

Based on the evidence I could see at Bristol, meanwhile, Colin Baker is starting to turn quite distressingly into Patrick Moore...

By Seb
May 18, 2006 @ 12:47 pm

reply / #


> Nice idea, but of course it'll never happen; certainly not on RTD's watch, as he's said he intends to never bring old Doctors into it.

Good point. I reckon he'd write Nine back in, though, the question is whether Ecclescakes would want to do it.

By Ian Symes
May 18, 2006 @ 12:57 pm

reply / #


I wasn't really that enthusiastic about the return of the Cybermen - I was far more excited about the return of Sarah Jane and K-9 a couple of weeks ago.
Tell you the truth, although I thought the tension building was well done, with 'proper' reveals of the Cybermen - who were the scariest I've ever seen them - only appearing in the last five minutes or so, I just thought it could have been a lot better.
Bad things - Roger Lloyd Pack was awful. It's one thing to be OTT or Hammy, but he was just something else. Not good.
Also - and I know this is just me being picky now - but you could see the sound/film crew reflected in Mona Hammond's glasses...

By si
May 18, 2006 @ 1:20 pm

reply / #


Isn't there a problem with any future use of McGann in that his image as the Doctor is part owned by an American company? I'm pretty sure that this is the case.

I want more McCoy episodes! He was GREAT in that feature film!

By James
May 18, 2006 @ 4:49 pm

reply / #


Actually, the one thing that really irritated me was the "DELETE DELETE DELETE" at the end. It's as if it was felt that every major villan should have a repeating catchphrase, and so we end up with Cybermen acting like Daleks.

I also think that there could have been a much better way to find a way back into the real universe other than breathing on some little thing and that magically giving power back in a day.

By Andrew Sidwell
May 18, 2006 @ 8:26 pm

reply / #


>going back to the Time War

This would be an excellent story for the final incarnation of the doctor. It would round off the whole Who story nicely if he could fine a way to save the timeloards and never be alone again.

By Spid
May 18, 2006 @ 8:42 pm

reply / #


"the final incarnation of the doctor"

Won't happen. They'll find a way around the 13 lives thing, either with a good enough reason or by ignoring it altogether. RTD has said on at least one Confidential that "the great thing" about Doctor Who is you can keep changing the lead actor so the series is able to go on forever. Somebody might decide to "rest" the series if it starts getting tired but nobody will have the authority or guts to end Who for good.

By James
May 19, 2006 @ 11:43 am

reply / #


Don't forget that it's on at 6:35pm tonight...

By John Hoare
May 20, 2006 @ 4:32 pm

reply / #


The ratings are going to suck balls for this episode, aren't they? That's the second year in a row when an obviously great episode is going to suffer (last year it was The Doctor Dances).

By Cappsy
May 20, 2006 @ 5:13 pm

reply / #


Why would the ratings do that? Was something special clashing?

By James
May 22, 2006 @ 12:33 am

reply / #


Why would the ratings do that? Was something special clashing?

Changing the time something is on *always* hits on ratings. Doctor Who is established at 7:00 on a Saturday. Put it on earlier than that, and a large chunk of your audience just wont show up, mainly because they turn on at 7:00 it's already half way through.

By Cappsy
May 22, 2006 @ 12:36 am

reply / #


On the ratings front - overnight ratings for TAoS are a pretty low 6.9million, down from overnight ratings of 8.6million last week.
Mind you, School Reunion had overnight ratings of 7.6m, and ended up with 8.3m, so it might not be too bad.

By si
May 22, 2006 @ 5:24 pm

reply / #