Oh...
As was stated at the time the accusations were originally made, there's a world of difference between being questioned over something, and being charged with it. Right now, though, things aren't looking particularly good, are they?
About this entry
- By Seb Patrick
- Posted on Thursday, May 11 2006 @ 4:27 pm
- Categorised in TV
- Tagged with chris langham
- 10 comments
It's absolutely pointless to speculate about this. We don't know the facts, simple as.
By Ian Symes
May 11, 2006 @ 6:51 pm
reply / #
Indeed.
By John Hoare
May 11, 2006 @ 6:53 pm
reply / #
I know it's pointless to speculate; I was just reporting the story, the truth that stands, that he's been charged. I just really, desperately hope it's not as bad as it sounds.
By Seb Patrick
May 11, 2006 @ 8:02 pm
reply / #
Wait a second, didn't they first arrest him over this the week after he'd won the British Comedy Awards?
By Rad
May 12, 2006 @ 12:35 pm
reply / #
Actually, now that you mention it, it is kind of strange for him to be arrested just after that, and charged just after winning a BAFTA...
By Seb
May 12, 2006 @ 1:55 pm
reply / #
He's denied it all though, hasn't he? Don't believe it, mesen.
By si
May 12, 2006 @ 4:50 pm
reply / #
NO SMOKE WITHOUT FIER! THROW THE BUCK AT HIM!
By James H
May 12, 2006 @ 5:31 pm
reply / #
> NO SMOKE WITHOUT FIER! THROW THE BUCK AT HIM!
That's unfair.
By performingmonkey
May 12, 2006 @ 7:53 pm
reply / #
Somehow I don't think he was being serious.
To any of the tabloid frenziers who would say "no smoke without fire!!!" though, I have two simple words. Matthew. Kelly.
By Seb Patrick
May 12, 2006 @ 8:27 pm
reply / #
I've just seen one of those People Like Us-style adverts of Goodfellas Pizzas, the ones where an interviewer (essentially Roy Mallard) shows restaurant-owners the new frozen pizzas, and they get angry about them and that. They replaced Langham's voiceover with David Mitchell. Sigh.
By Ian Symes
May 18, 2006 @ 11:57 am
reply / #