Doctor Who - The Stolen Earth
I am absolutely in two minds over this episode. It's exuberant, thrilling and emotional - more so than any penultimate episode so far - and it's everything-including-the-kitchen-sink attitude feels like a great reward for loyal viewers. Yet, The Stolen Earth, quite like the episode preceding it, melts away when you think about it too hard, revealing a number of cack-handed plot decisions, and including EVERYTHING set up in the series so far necessitates the revival of some things which are less welcome than others.
As usual, the Doctor's last adventure of the series begins with him landing in London, and wondering quite what the matter is. The formulaic nature of this scene is forgiveable in that it's followed literally moments later by an event of monumentous scale. It's a sly promise that events are going to zip along a bit faster this time, which the episode mostly delivers on.
One of the flaws of this revival has been it's annual insistence on an "arc" which has extended no further than the repeated, grating insertions of a particular phrase into every episode. This year has handled its arc a little more smoothly, and it's great fun to see the pattern of events reveal itself, rather than to simply find out what "Torchwood" means or who "Mr. Saxon" is - a pair of flat, unengaging non-mysteries. Alien species losing their home planet has been a frequently re-used plot device since New Who's inception, and it's gotten annoying of late. Folding lazy writing into a plot thread at this late stage feels a bit like cheating, but as a viewer, my attitude at this point seems to be sort of in line with Russell T Davies - fuck it, basically. With his tenure coming to a close, he's decided to bow out in spectacular style, and that rampant glee is what makes the episode work, and makes the weak points easier to forgive.
The excuses for including various characters from Who's past range from the credible to crap. It's unclear whether the Doctor's tense exchange with Harriet Jones at the end of The Christmas Invasion was meant to have such lasting significance, but it's cleverly deployed as an excuse for her role in the "Doctor's Secret Army". It's surprisingly nice to see Torchwood, and does add to the sense of scale, but Sarah-Jane's attic fits less well with the tone of its parent series. Meanwhile, Martha Jones has been sleeping her way up the UNIT ranks, as her character has once again received a promotion despite showing no outward signs of competence in any field. She's desperately unconvincing throughout the episode. Billie gets one great scene, and spends the rest of the episode walking around with a dull expression on her unsettlingly different face. Two episodes into a three episode stint and she's barely been given anything to actually do, yet - something which will severely damage how well these episodes play in the future, no matter how good next week's conclusion is. But having her stand around waving her phone in the air, trying to get a signal? Do Nokia sponsor Doctor Who, now?
Martha Jones aside, it's a well acted episode, too - the presence of Bernard Cribbins, Penelope Wilton, Adjoa Andoh and other old people proving an asset, but no-one embarrasses themselves here. Oh, except Ianto, clearly turned to comfort eating since the death of his Torchwood colleagues, with his bad pretend laugh at Paul O'Grady. I don't even really mind that Paul O'Grady appeared in the episode, despite it stretching credibility an awful lot and being just the kind of thing I usually despise. Having chubby Ianto mock-guffawing at it on a monitor when he should have been doing something much more important is a bit of another sly hint to the audience - Rusty is saying he likes those bits, and fuck you too. I can put up with his banal sense of humour when the episodes are this exciting, it seems, or maybe when a brave new era of Moffatt-led greatness is just around the corner.
Then there's the Daleks, of course. And they're as good as they've ever been, washing the foul after-taste of Daleks In Manhattan clean away. It's really only that story which has led to the general consensus that they're over-exposed as a villain - all their other appearances have been great, and a one season break from them would have been plenty. It certainly didn't help matters that their last appearance was total hogwash. As such, Stolen Earth has to work quite hard to make them seem as threatening as they once did, and the fact that most of the returning characters have had life-altering encounters with them in the past certainly helps the feeling of dread. That Martha only had a totally crap encounter with them weakens her character further still, sadly.
It's great that there's several discernible characters amongst the Daleks now, like in the old Dalek comics, but not so much in the old Doctor Who. Davros is beautifully realised - more menacing and insane than ever. Dalek Caan, driven insane by his journey into the "time-locked" Time War to rescue Davros, is also a hoot. RTD has always written flawless dialogue for the Daleks, and the back and forth between them is a real highlight.
The effects are wonderful, with The Mill turning in some of their best work yet. Their beautiful visualisation of The Shadow Proclamation, glowing turquoise in space, gives the scenes actually set there a sense of importance which scenes filmed in leisure centres don't usually have.
The cliffhanger was delightful, too - obviously a red-herring, but the episode was whizzing by with such tremendous gravitas that I was sort of fooled at the time. My first thoughts were that Tennant wouldn't leave after an episode which featured comparatively little of him; but it was an effective way of having the audience desperately wanting to not have seen the last of him. So, next week's inevitable cop-out won't feel like such a cop-out. I very much hope it's resolved in an interesting way, though - if there's a big "reset" button anywhere in the story, I'm going to be very angry. And for the record, the theory I am going with is that he will regenerate into John Simm for a little bit.
The episode is fundamentally dodgy, but by stuffing it full of so many great things and explosions and spaceships, Russell has managed to make its flaws difficult to give a shit about, if not difficult to spot.
About this entry
- By Michael Lacey
- Posted on Tuesday, July 01 2008 @ 3:29 pm
- Categorised in TV, Review
- Tagged with doctor who
- 24 comments
>if there's a big "reset" button anywhere in the story, I'm going to be very angry
And yet, what's the alternative? Have the human race be aware that their planet was once moved by aliens. It's bad enough that the Earth is seemingly invaded or witnesses a big fuck-off spaceship on a yearly basis, but this is probably a step too far. There used to be a marked difference in the aliens and the humans; the aliens were not naive. The more stuff they see, the less the audience can relate to the inhabitants of DW Earth.
By Pete Martin
July 01, 2008 @ 4:30 pm
reply / #
In my fantasy S4, the Doctor-lite episode was all about Dalek Caan falling through time and rescuing Davros' ship from the Time War, Timelord regenerations going off like firecrackers in the background.
This week was great, but I'm already bracing myself for the horrific reset switch to come.
By Andy M
July 01, 2008 @ 4:40 pm
reply / #
> > if there's a big "reset" button anywhere in the story, I'm going to be very angry
> And yet, what's the alternative? Have the human race be aware that their planet was once moved by aliens.
Given the invasions so far, I don't see a problem.
Or rather I DO, but it's with this general aspect of New Who rather than this one plot issue. Sure they can remember, why not? They remember all the other stuff. It's not something I like about Davies' incarnation of the show, but he's got no problem seeing it through to the end. The Xmas special seems to include yet another invasion - he may as well carry on and then Moffat can tone it all down later if he chooses. (I don't think anyone'll object if certain invasions simply 'aren't mentioned' when his tenure begins, with humanity back in the dark without any big reset button having to be pushed.)
Meanwhile, back to the current ep, and I suspect EVERY planet is going to be returned to its point of origin (saving Earth but leaving the other populations behind seems unlikely).
By Andrew
July 01, 2008 @ 4:57 pm
reply / #
>he cliffhanger was delightful, too - obviously a red-herring, but the episode was whizzing by with such tremendous gravitas that I was sort of fooled at the time.
Oh, I was completely taken-in because I instinctively felt that Davies wanted to pull-out all the stops for his last series and that he was hiding something else besides the return of Davros (which, like the Master, was a barely-kept secret). I'd expected a big revelation regarding Donna so the "regenerating Doctor" thing just knocked me for six. Even when he got shot I thought "oh, he'll just gurn and sweat until they get him to a hospital and explain the non-regeneration in some way" so when it happened it was a bit ZOMG.
But, yeah, if they were going to kill-off Doctor no.10 they'd surely give him a Doctor-heavy episode first and it all felt a bit red-herring looking back at it. I'm dreading a "reset" switch as well, especially after another "there's something on your back" to Donna but I suspect that the hand in the bubbly water might have a part to play...
The episode itself. Well, I liked it as spectacle but there wasn't much in the way of story so much as things happening and characters being re-introduced; very much three-star stuff for me. The highlight for me was definitely Davros, a brilliant "if it ain't broke..." bit of realisation; he was as barmy and creepy as he's always been.
By Zagrebo
July 01, 2008 @ 5:15 pm
reply / #
Two words : Parallel. Timeline. What, you think the "something on your back" story is over yet? Not by a long shot.
Under normal circumstances, I'd agree. But remember "Dalek" - that story established firmly that no-one on Earth before the year 2012 can know what a Dalek actually is or what it's called...
By Seb
July 01, 2008 @ 5:24 pm
reply / #
Death To The Metaltrons!
By Andy M
July 01, 2008 @ 5:53 pm
reply / #
> But remember "Dalek" - that story established firmly that no-one on Earth before the year 2012 can know what a Dalek actually is or what it's called...
I honestly don't think that kind of continuity matters much - the events of Dalek were as they happened at the time. The Doctor talked about Harriet Jones originally as ushering in a golden age...by that Christmas he was deposing her. But if she was deposed, how can he recall the era he talked about?
"Time's in flux but remains hardy", blah blah...
Still, sure, there's all manner of alternate Earths and reset buttons available. Not saying it won't happen, just that it doesn't NEED to. Who generally only has to be consistent within each episode.
So are we looking at the erasure of the series 2 and 3 Dalek stories, too? People definitely saw those buggers...
By Andrew
July 01, 2008 @ 6:03 pm
reply / #
> What, you think the "something on your back" story is over yet? Not by a long shot.
Yeah, I think they're gonna reveal she had 'something on her back' a while before she hooked back up with the Doctor. Perhaps related to the Master's ring... probably not though. Let's go all out and say that she's had something on her back since BIRTH and must DIEEEEEEMWAHAHABWEHUHU!!!!!!! in order to set everything right. Somehow if she goes back in time and kills herself Davros will not return. OR she stops herself from picking up the ring. OR she uses a NAND gate instead of an OR gate. ORRRRRRR she whips out her massive breasts and begins to feed the Doctor thus becoming his mother in an alternate timeline and thus the space-time continuum blinks and is gone.
By performingmonkey
July 01, 2008 @ 8:33 pm
reply / #
The line at the Shadow Proclamation was "You HAD something on your back". Past tense. Wasn't it?
By Andrew
July 02, 2008 @ 12:18 am
reply / #
It was "There was something on your back": http://sandwich.ukcod.org.uk/~matthew/subtitles/?q=series:4+ep:12#I421
(wow, I found a use for it :) I think people here might like it...)
By dracos.co.uk
July 02, 2008 @ 1:57 pm
reply / #
Excellent!
By Andrew
July 02, 2008 @ 2:01 pm
reply / #
But why would RTD feel the need to throw in the fact that she HAD something on her back again? It must still be relevant...
I don't think there's any way we can be anything but disappointed by what the 'revelation' about Donna will be. After all, it's been bigged up enough, what with Rose calling her the most important woman in all creation. She said 'I'm a human being!' quite pointedly, maybe getting that across to us before revealing that bloody hell she's NOT... 'Temp' is mentioned again. 'Temp Donna' literally means 'Time Lady', and of course her surname 'Noble' fits too. But surely RTD didn't have that planned when he first thought her up as a one-off Christmas special character...right...?? Would being the only female Time Lord in the universe make her the most important woman in all creation?
By performingmonkey
July 02, 2008 @ 6:32 pm
reply / #
> But why would RTD feel the need to throw in the fact that she HAD something on her back again? It must still be relevant...
I don't disagree. But I think it first and foremost acts as a reminder of last week's key points - many dimensions, Donna's prescribed fate, etc. It has a function, but maybe not as simple as 'and she's still got the bug on her back which means we're in a different reality'.
By Andrew
July 02, 2008 @ 6:56 pm
reply / #
The new clip on the Who site features yet another returning character. If the Britain of Stolen Earth weren't quite so close to the one we've already seen this season, I'd be tempted to think we were IN the Rise of the Cybermen dimension...
By Andrew
July 02, 2008 @ 7:20 pm
reply / #
The Tardis is working, over and above all that Andrew :p
By Somebody
July 03, 2008 @ 6:18 am
reply / #
"He is coming. The threefold man, he dances in the lonely places. Oh, creator of us all. The Doctor is coming. . .".
2 Tennants plus another? Not Donna surely? Is Chris Eccleston going to appear "out of the Time War"??
By Anonymous
July 03, 2008 @ 4:21 pm
reply / #
Dalek Caan did say the above, and also: "everlasting death for the most faithful companion...".
So - faithful companion? Who we DIDN'T see last week? Surely they can't kill K9 :-(
By Anon
July 03, 2008 @ 4:41 pm
reply / #
The 'threefold man' could be a reference to the three Ninth Doctors.
Or, you know... not.
By Jonathan Capps
July 03, 2008 @ 9:04 pm
reply / #
Brilliant episode.
Does anyone know why Rose was talking the way she was? Like, she spoke normal one minuite and then she spoke strange the next. She did this in "Turn Left" too.
By MJN SEIFER
July 05, 2008 @ 10:48 pm
reply / #
> Like, she spoke normal one minuite and then she spoke strange the next.
I'm willing to accept that Billie had forgotten how to 'do' Rose's accent. She's been playing olde worlde maids and posh hookers - the chav accent had clearly evaporated.
A season of build up to see them reunited and...she gets a few minutes with him, as part of a group, before he dumps her home?If the whole thing weren't so overwhelmingly BRILLIANT I'd have real issues with that conclusion.
By Andrew
July 06, 2008 @ 8:56 pm
reply / #
I gather she has new veneers on her front teeth, hence them looking different. Still not used to them for much of the filming she was pronouncing "s" as "sh" at some moments of Turn Left. When she smiles at Donna before sending her back in time (or it might be the other scene in the same set, where the beetle is being revealed to Donna), Billie's still has her own teeth. So they must have filmed either side of Billie getting her veneers. She seems to have stopped lisping during Journey's End, though.
By J Clark
July 06, 2008 @ 10:00 pm
reply / #
That's the most ridiculous thing I've read in a long time. And I've read your work on Wikipedia.
By Andrew
July 07, 2008 @ 2:04 am
reply / #
In 'Turn Left' she only lisped on the ADR, of which there seemed to be a lot of.
By performingmonkey
July 07, 2008 @ 4:11 am
reply / #
> And I've read your work on Wikipedia.
?
By J Clark
July 08, 2008 @ 1:52 am
reply / #